Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Reality of gun control

Published: Thursday, January 20, 2011

Updated: Thursday, January 20, 2011 20:01

gun control

Abraham Hernandez — THE BATTALION

On Oct. 16, 1991, George Jo Hennard drove his pickup through the front door of Luby's in Killeen. Using his truck to barricade the front door, he went on to murder 23 people, wounding 20 others before taking his own life.

 

Suzanna Gratia Hupp was eating with her parents when Hennard plowed through the entrance to Luby's. When Hennard began firing, the family flipped over the table for cover, and Suzanna instinctively reached in her purse for her .38-caliber Smith & Wesson before realizing she had started leaving it in her vehicle a few months before for fear of losing her chiropractic license. Her father, Al Gratia, was gunned down while charging Hennard. Her mother was executed while holding her husband's head in her lap as he bled.

 

The Luby's massacre eventually led to the 1995 passage of SB60 in the Texas legislature, which allowed Texans the right to carry a firearm with a Concealed Handgun License. Suzanna Gratia Hupp was a huge proponent of the law and would be elected to the Texas State Legislature in 1996.

 

Fast-forward 20 years and our nation has suffered another tragedy in Tucson. The assault on a federal legislator has made gun control a popular topic in Washington.

 

Peter King, Republican representative from New York, has proposed making it a crime to knowingly carry a firearm within 1,000 feet of  "high ranking officials." As a practical matter, it is impossible to check everyone within 1,000 feet of highly ranked officials. It is unlikely that someone bent on violence would give a second thought to such a paper barrier. It will, however, stop law-abiding gun-carrying citizens from being any help and give those hell-bent on violence the peace of mind that those in close proximity to a highly ranked official are more or less defenseless.

 

New York Democratic Rep. Carolyn McCarthy and New Jersey Senate Democrat Frank Lautenberg have proposed legislation to ban high-capacity clips and limit them to only 10 rounds of ammunition.

 

This might help if there wasn't a multitude of high capacity clips in circulation (there are), if there was a realistic way track sales (there isn't), and if madmen didn't have any other options (they do).

 

Someone with a determination to kill won't have a problem buying a high-capacity clip grandfathered in before this would-be legislation was passed. The gunman could simply pull a "New York Reload" as the Virginia Tech shooter did by carrying a second weapon. Just as terrorists have consistently found new ways to wreak havoc, there are endless ways for a madman to find a bigger clip, another gun or resort to alternatives. Normal law-abiding gun owners are the ones who are discouraged by red tape.

 

New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg has been glorifying his city's oppressive gun laws that almost ensure that only criminals have guns.  This crucial flaw points out the absurdity of these feel-good policies. Criminals don't care about a 1,000 feet paper barrier. Would-be assassins don't give up because an extended clip is no longer sold at Wal-Mart. Violent malcontents don't care about petty infractions. Regular law-abiding citizens care about petty infractions.

 

Gun Control proponents seem unable to fundamentally understand the primary consequence of their laws.  Fewer good guys with guns.

 

According to the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, Utah has the most permissive gun laws in the country. It also has one of the lowest murder rates at 1.5 per 100,000 according to US Census Bureau. Conversely, California has the strictest gun laws in the country but beats the national average at 5.8 per 100,000. Until 2007, Washington D.C. even banned handguns but still led the nation with more than 30 murders per 100,000.

 

Recently, Senator Jeff Wentworth from TX District 25 introduced TX Senate Bill 354. The bill would allow concealed handgun license holders to carry on college campuses. The bill won't stop bad people from attempting heinous crimes, but it does create a chance for good people to stop them.

 

Suzanna Gratia Hupp lost both of her parents Oct. 16, 1991 on the floor of a Luby's because of a paper barrier. A barrier law-abiding citizens won't cross, a barrier that killers don't respect, a barrier that leaves students defenseless even today. It's time to end the feel-good policies that favor the monsters among us at the expense of the innocent.

 

In memory of: Patricia Brawn Carney, Jimmie Eugene Caruthers, Kriemhild A. Davis, Lt. Col. Steven Charles Dody, Al Gratia, Ursula Edith Marie Gratia, Debra Ann Gray, Dr. Michael Edward Griffith, Venice Ellen Henehan, Clodine Delphia Humphrey, Sylvia Mathilde King, Zona Mae Lynn, Dr. Connie Dean Peterson, Ruth Marie Pujol, Su-zann Neal, John Raymond Romero Jr, Thomas Earl Simmons, Glen Arval Spivey, Nancy Faye Stansbury, Olgica Andonovsk Taylor, James Walter Welsh, Lula Belle Welsh, Iva Juanita Williams.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

4 comments Log in to Comment

sammy2013
Mon Jan 24 2011 18:56
It appeared you were saying more gun control is a good thing when it is not. More guns do equal less crime, for example Switzerland actually has very lax gun laws, and every male from 18-45 is in the militia and they all have assault rifles (as in real military weapons, not what the left in America calls assault weapons) and pistols in their homes. They can freely carry, and shooting is a national hobby. The crime rate their is spectacularly low, because criminals do not want to attack people who have a high chance of being armed. Most crime there is committed by foreigners who do not have that psych ingrained in them as native Swiss do. I don't have the book where I got the number from at the moment, but I can get the information on where that statistic came from. It is really just common sense, because outlawing anything leads to a thriving black market for it, and most guns used in crimes are purchased illegally. Washington DC and Chicago, before their handgun bans were ruled unconstitutional, saw huge increases in gun crime for the simple fact that disarmed people make easy targets. The police will not be able to get anywhere in an instant, and if someone is trying to rob me or assault me, I would far rather have a gun in my hand than a phone while I'm waiting for the police to get there, which can be a very long time.
obas
Mon Jan 24 2011 15:42
Not sure where you got that number, although I find it hard to believe. you say it increased by a factor of 3.4? Tell me is the number of people that get killed higher of lower in England (when compared to the US)? What has suicide rate to do with gun crime? I'm not making an argument about gun control here, I'm only trying to point out that the writers argument about "less restrictions, less gun crime" is incorrect. Furthermore, the writes argument that criminals will not be stopped if there is a ban on guns. That might be true, but it also gives the police more chances (no guarantee) to stop that criminal before he can do anything (Loughner or the Virginia Tech shooter tried to purchase their guns).
sammy2013
Fri Jan 21 2011 12:46
But you fail to mention how, after they practically banned all guns, England's gun crime rate shot through the roof, increasing 340% in just a few years. Or how Japan, which has next to no guns except in the hand of the Army, has a suicide rate higher than our suicide and homicide rate combined. Also, on those campuses that do allow concealed carry, there hasn't been an increase in violence, or a single gun theft, or anything. We do need concealed carry on campus, because whenever gun laws become more lax there is never the bloodbath that those advocating gun control predict. And this article makes the good point that criminals don't care about a sign that says guns aren't allowed. If they want to break the biggest social taboo ever and murder someone, then they aren't going to care about some sign or any other law.
obas
Fri Jan 21 2011 12:37
The whole article is very biased. If you want to cite numbers from the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence also mention that the firearm homicide rate in the US was 44 times that of England and Wales or that U.S. homicide rates are 6.9 times higher than 22 other populous, high-income countries combined. The whole reasoning is flawed and based on assumptions. Using the names names of all those people that got killed for your political view is pretty despicable by the way.

You must be logged in to comment on an article. Not already a member? Register now

Log In