College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students Jobs and internships for students -

Students protest silently with empty holsters this week

Students for Concealed Carry on Campus raise awareness about rights

Published: Tuesday, April 6, 2010

Updated: Tuesday, April 6, 2010 23:04

In the wake of campus tragedies such as the Virginia Tech shootings, students across the nation support concealed guns on college campuses. Texas A&M’s chapter of Students for Concealed Carry on Campus is participating in the Empty Holster Protest this week.

“The Empty Holster Protest is something that is done nationally every year with Students for Concealed Carry on Campus,” said Lisa MacIntyre, a junior psychology major and public relations officer for the A&M chapter. “Basically, it’s to raise awareness for the cause of concealed carry on campus. We’re wanting to get people asking questions that way we can discuss it with them and tell them what we’re all about, what we’re fighting for.”

The A&M chapter of the national organization is expecting about 900 students to be on campus this week with empty holsters. The group serves as the lead organization for the state.

“We have a whole lot of branches on Texas campuses, but ours has been sort of the flagship this year,” said Chase Jennings a sophomore environmental studies major and vice chairman of the organization. “It’s really the leading campus.”

“A&M is leading because the event is more than a protest for the organization,” said Texas State Rifle Association Executive Director Charles Cotton.

“We’ll have tons of flyers and information and officers manning the tables,” said Derek Titus, a senior industrial distribution major and chairman of the organization. “They’ll be answering questions or any concerns that people may have.”

The group plans to use this week as an opportunity to recruit people to their organization and raise awareness about the issue.

“Our plan for the week is to use Empty Holster Protest in order to gain awareness of our organization,” Titus said. “We believe we have a silent majority in that most people agree with us, and don’t know an organization like this exists. We’re really trying to raise awareness and bring a lot of others that agree with our cause to be able to join in and join our cause. Our main focus is sort of recruitment in a way.”

Students for Concealed Carry on Campus supports the ability to carry a concealed weapon onto a college campus if the carrier is licensed. The licensing process requires an individual to undergo training with the weapon, a background check and prove their knowledge of carrying laws.

“Once you do that, you’re allowed to carry in shopping malls, in grocery stores, in businesses all around the state,” MacIntyre said. “We’re trying to draw attention to the fact that there isn’t much of a difference between carrying a gun across the street from the University and then coming onto campus. It’s still the same people, the same people who are licensed to carry everywhere else, who are actually quite law-abiding.”

The Empty Holster Protest is the main event for the organization nationwide and has caught the attention of state legislators.

“It’s obviously been an issue for quite a while now, and it’s really heated these past few years,” Jennings said. “We were about to get the bill passed through the state legislature, through the Senate, and we had the number of votes. It was going to pass. The only reason it didn’t pass is because another bill got filibustered before it.”

This is the third year for the Empty Holster Protest on A&M’s campus and it will continue through Friday.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

17 comments Log in to Comment

Anonymous
Wed Apr 21 2010 10:08
Why are people acting like the only time one would have to defend themselves is in a school shooting? People get robbed all the time on campus, some women have been raped. Think about it - your girlfriend, your sister, your best friend is getting her shirt ripped off by someone she didn't agree to have sex with and you're miles away. How is she going to defend herself? Is she going to flail her arms like a Raggedy Ann doll? I would hope not. I would hope she atleast has a knife.
Anonymous
Tue Apr 20 2010 23:43
Whether a zone is gun free or not, people with the malicious, disturbed or warped intent to bring harm to others through the use of firearms are going to do so, regardless of the laws regarding gun permitting or the number of people who are also armed in an area. The sad fact is that people who reach the level that causes these incidents will and have done everything in their power to do the harm they have decided on.

The concern that I think should receive more attention with regards to allowing concealed handguns on campus is the training level of the handlers - while there are many concealed permits issued to individuals who train and understand the use of weapons responsibly, how often are they in crisis situations where there is active shooting? How readily would a person be able in the chaos of a situation to identify the shooter, subdue them (be this incapacitate or kill) and not further the confusion or risk being then mistaken as the source of the violence themselves by other armed citizens or the public under attack? When the police and other entities who train and have not only the technical and psychological training to manage such violent situations become involved (and the issue of response time, etc. is a separate argument) - how do they cope with 3 or 4 armed people instead of 1? Witnesses and panicked crowds are not known for being able to discern right from wrong, especially if there is a lack of markings to differentiate a shooter from police, for example. An armed civilian attempting to end the violence is not necessarily easily discerned from an assailant in the chaos of a moment. The issue of fighting for one's life and self protection also has to be considered, since the immediacy and stress of a situation where a violent shooter appears is significantly different than that of a gun range or more controlled practice - some people simply might not even react in time or move to use a weapon, even if they have it available, let alone possibly misuse it.

Think of the issues that then raises for the aftermath, to sort out and its potential for even FURTHER violence, as well as the fact that in high stress/high violence situations normal reactions and training are not necessarily how a person who is not regularly exposed to them would react.

I am not saying that the issue is a simple yes or no, but the practical and human-psychological that affect the issue and safety of the larger group are important to consider. As a note, I do respect that we have the 2nd Amendment to support people's right to bear arms, but this was dictated at a time when we had no standing military or police force on the scale we have today, and in a growing war situation that is, despite some of the news on such terrible shootings that have happened at campuses, not the current mode of life.

Just some thoughts on the issue.

Classof71aggie
Thu Apr 15 2010 23:48
D.Wells, in addition to the comments favoring concealed carry by licensees on campuses that referred to the shootings at the Luby's in Killeen, and Virginia Tech, what about the recent shootings at Fort Hood, where an islamic militant armed with a couple of handguns went to an auditorium, a "GUN FREE ZONE" and killed a bunch of soldiers? none of the soldiers there were allowed to carry, either concealed or openly, with the exception of a few military policemen. It took them, and city/state police more than 15 minutes to respond to the incident.

In order to be able to qualify for a concealed carry license, one must first be at least 21, the minimum age for being able to buy a handgun (according to the Gun Control Act of 1968. One further must have no criminal record, (just as anyone who buys a firearm from a federally-licencsed fireams dealer), nor can one be under indictment for any felony (and some misdemeanor) crimes. Once you pass the course, one should be able to carry anywhere in the country. after all, the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution clearly states that the right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

stonewall
Fri Apr 9 2010 08:10
"wells: That place is not bars, banks, schools, airports, etc". A debate works when you explain why you believe something not just stating you believe something. I know what you are going to say for a couple these so to clear things up. Gun laws are similar to DUI laws and contrary to popular belief not everybody goes to a bar to become intoxicated so if you drink responsibly and remain sober no reason why you shouldn't be allowed to have a firearm in a bar. At an airport everybody is on equal footing since criminals don't have weapons either and there is a large presence of armed security personnel so I am okay with checking my firearm when flying. Banks and schools make no sense to me law abiding citizens don't spontaneously become criminals because they possess a firearm. A criminal who plans to commit a crime is not going to be concerned with breaking an additional law.
Anonymous '90
Thu Apr 8 2010 15:36
For D. Wells: Until the shooting at VA Tech, the nation's deadliest shooting was at the Luby's in Killeen, Texas. On October 16, 1991 George Hennard drove his truck into the Luby's and began shooting patrons. "During the shooting, Hennard approached Suzanna Gratia Hupp and her parents. Hupp had actually brought a handgun to the Luby's Cafeteria that day but had left it in her vehicle because laws in force at the time forbade citizens from carrying firearms. According to her later testimony in favor of Missouri's HB-1720 bill and in general, after she realized that her firearm was not in her purse but "a hundred feet away in [her] car," her father charged at Hennard in an attempt to subdue him but was gunned down; a short time later, Hupp's mother was also shot and killed. Hupp later expressed regret for abiding by the law in question by leaving her firearm in her car rather than keeping it on her person."

Gratia Hupp later became a member of Texas' congress and helped pass concealed carry in Texas. For leaving her gun in her car in a "gun free zone" she lost both of her parents.

D Wells '98
Thu Apr 8 2010 13:11
You get me wrong. I don't mind concealed hand-guns. There is a place for them. That place is not bars, banks, schools, airports, etc. You want to carry a gunf, fine. But when you go to some of these places, leave it in the car./truck.
Anonymous
Wed Apr 7 2010 23:58
Misquoted, I meant to say
"I will NOT impose my will on you."
I apologize for misunderstanding on that part.
Anonymous
Wed Apr 7 2010 23:56
Do not fear the weapon for it is merely a tool. Truly, one who fears a firearm, is an ill informed fool. Respect it, most certainly, for its potential is evident; but, at the end of the day it is only lump of metal incapable of anything. No, it is the will of of the one who welds it to determine its use. Is the jawbone of a donkey a dangerous weapon? In haste in trying to prove your arrogance you would say 'NO,' in blinding yourself to evident truths, I know a man who has slain a thousand men with that weapon. Oh, and the number is not exaggerated. The tool is nothing, it is the man who deems what is a weapon. If you do not wish to carry I will impose my will on you. Personal note, I prefer my 1911, but since circumstances prevent me from carrying I make it up with my hands, just my hands not to sound boastful, but if I came at you "unarmed" you would certainly want a firearm.
RV8
Wed Apr 7 2010 15:17
TO JASON AND D WELLS......If you would do some research, you would find that VT, Columbine, Ft. Hood, Lubby's Cafeteria and many of the places where mass shootings occured, were BY LAW, "gun free zones". Guns were PROHIBITED in the places where these massacres took place. In Washington DC last year, it became legal for people to keep guns in their homes for personal protection; in the ONE YEAR since that happened, crime is DOWN 24%. In Kennesaw, GA they had a horrible problem with crime until 1982 when a new administration made it a town ordinance that every home have a gun in it. The result? The following year crime was DOWN 89%...yes 89%. Here in my little town of 18,000 in Indiana, there are about 1,600 of us walking around that can carry legally; can you explain why we aren't shooting each other? Can you explain why we've had only ONE SHOOTING IN TWENTY YEARS? That shooting, by the way, was committed by some "nice boys" from Chicago; handguns are COMPLETELY BANNED there, yet they are among the top cities for gun crime and murder. In Illinois, concealed carry is ILLEGAL; here in Indiana, we can carry LEGALLY. Why then, does Illinois have a higher gun crime and murder rate than we do? Of the 102 county sheriffs in Illinois, 92 of them publicly SUPPORT concealed carry. Jason and D Wells, I suggest you guys check the facts; in February, the FBI released the national crime stats...nationwide, crime is at a 25 YEAR LOW, while gun ownership is at RECORD HIGHS. So much for that "more guns more crime" nonsense........
Richard
Wed Apr 7 2010 14:40
Jason writes: What sort of perverted logic says that the solution to gun violence is more guns? . Well, Jason, if you were paying attention, this has been proved time and time again. Most recently by John Lott, in his book 'More Guns, Less Crime', published in 1998 (University of Chicago Press). In every instance, the more that guns are available to law abiding citizens, the more violent crime drops. It is proven in virtually every state that has instituted 'shall issue' concealed carry laws (more than 40 of them now since the revolution began in Florida in the late 80's). It's simple: Crime drops because the bad guys don't know who is armed and who isn't. Do a little research and stop relying on mainstream media and other emotional knee-jerk conclusions.
Jason
Wed Apr 7 2010 13:53
What sort of perverted logic says that the solution to gun violence is more guns?
John
Wed Apr 7 2010 13:37
To Anonymous @ 13:28 - Actually it is a requirement to be able to shoot accurately. The shooting test for a Texas concealed handgun license is very similar to the shooting test that Texas State Troopers have to take every year to recertify.
Anonymous
Wed Apr 7 2010 13:34
Actually it kind of does. There is a range qualification for it. While not hard to pass, you do need to be proficient to qualify. Also, if you injure someone other than the bad guy, you lose your legal defense for shooting.
Anonymous
Wed Apr 7 2010 13:28
Concealed Carry doesn't mean you can accurately shoot a gun.. If that was a requirement, I would be for it, but I refused to have one of you sh*t sloppy shots running around trying to aim at a bad guy and shot me instead.
Stu Strickler
Wed Apr 7 2010 12:10
Responding to D Wells '98. We all won't be carrying guns on Campus. Only a small percentage of us will be. There are an estimated 6 million concealed carry licence holders in the United States.

You may not want to carry a firearm for personal protection and that is your right. Don't try to tell the rest of us we can't.

Just as at Virginia Tech, Gun free zones are killing zones. How many people must be murdered in cold blood, before people wake up?

Anonymous
Wed Apr 7 2010 10:30
Sounds like you have been watching too much government sponsored TV. Just think for yourself for a moment. VT had a ban on weapons and look what happened. The only option people had was to die at the hands of a nut job who just wanted to kill. I would at least like to have a fighting chance in this situation. How would you deal with a VT shooting? Sit there an wait to be shot while texting your mom about an active shooter on campus? Or would you fight for your life?

I promise you will never have to touch or look at my evil gun and I also promise that I will not use it to defend you in any way. As a matter of fact, you will never know it's there. I will however use it to defend myself and my loved ones if necessary.

I am one of the millions of people that legally carry a gun every day. You pass by us without ever knowing. We are not the problem. Criminals are the problem.

I'm all for the concealed carry on campus. Why should your right to protect yourself end because you cross the street or even a state line?

D Wells '98
Wed Apr 7 2010 09:01
Oh yeah, lets all carry guns on Campus. A&M will be in the news just like VT.

You must be logged in to comment on an article. Not already a member? Register now

Log In