A&M leaders promote University to incoming Hispanic students
Abstract:
"Here at [Texas] A&M we don't just educate your mind, we educate your soul," said Student Body President Conner Prochaska....
- Displaying 1 - 13 of 13
Alejandro E. Martinez
posted 6/06/07 @ 8:10 AM CST
As I was resurrecting my brain cells this morning with my daily dose of caffeine, I ran across Wiginton's response to the article by Travis Robinson. I am a proud American of Mexican descent and thus was inspired to respond to some of his comments.
For millennia, various tribes of Native Americans occupied the region that is now known as Texas. Granted, they may not have "founded" this region enough to meet Wiggonton's criteria. But I think most historians would argue his point. For example, the Caddos tribe were succesful agriculturists who lived in permanent abodes. The Lipan-Apache tribe had the most contact with early Texas settlers and eventually, became allies of the Texans in campaigns against other Indians.
Let us assume for the sake of argument that the various tribes did not meet Wiggonton's founder criteria. Then I submit to you the history of the Spanish efforts into this region dating back as far as 1519. Throughout the 18th century, Spain establish Catholic missions in Texas, and along with this missions, the towns of San Antonio, Goliad, and Nacogdoches.
The only, repeat, only way one can say that the Anglos, Irish, Scots, Germans, Czechs, Norwegians and Swedes founded Texas is to believe that on January 3, 1823 God created Texas. And on that same day, Stephen F. Austin just happened to secure a land grant from the Mexican government. And from that day on, Anglos, Irish, Scots, Germans, Czechs, Norwegians, Swedes AND Mexicans worked together to build from scratch what would eventually become our great state of Texas.
In regards to Wiggonton's question as to why is there no promotion of the founding ethnicities of our state, I would like to suggest that he look at the enrollment figures for Spring of 2007. In these figures he will find that of the 33,995 undergraduates, 26,830 of them were classified as White. I do believe that the founding ethnicities are proudly represented within the 26,830.
The statement that really surprised me was the one where Wigginton claims that we fought wars against Hispanics. Wars that they agitated and thus began. Based on what I remember from my school days, relations between Mexico and Texans started to sour a bit when Mexico forbid further emigration into Texas by settlers from the United States. While I am glad that Texas eventually secured its independence from Mexico, I am not sure you could classify them as the agitators.
Last but not least, the article is far from proving that racism exists at Texas A&M. In fact, I view the effort by the institution as simply promoting diversity. As long as this fine institution does NOT lower academic qualification criteria for ANY group, I applaud their recruitment efforts.
Sincerely,
Alejandro E. Martinez
Proud Aggie Parent
PS I for one would fight the renaming of College Station as mentioned in your response. However, the correct translation is - Estacion de Colegio.
For millennia, various tribes of Native Americans occupied the region that is now known as Texas. Granted, they may not have "founded" this region enough to meet Wiggonton's criteria. But I think most historians would argue his point. For example, the Caddos tribe were succesful agriculturists who lived in permanent abodes. The Lipan-Apache tribe had the most contact with early Texas settlers and eventually, became allies of the Texans in campaigns against other Indians.
Let us assume for the sake of argument that the various tribes did not meet Wiggonton's founder criteria. Then I submit to you the history of the Spanish efforts into this region dating back as far as 1519. Throughout the 18th century, Spain establish Catholic missions in Texas, and along with this missions, the towns of San Antonio, Goliad, and Nacogdoches.
The only, repeat, only way one can say that the Anglos, Irish, Scots, Germans, Czechs, Norwegians and Swedes founded Texas is to believe that on January 3, 1823 God created Texas. And on that same day, Stephen F. Austin just happened to secure a land grant from the Mexican government. And from that day on, Anglos, Irish, Scots, Germans, Czechs, Norwegians, Swedes AND Mexicans worked together to build from scratch what would eventually become our great state of Texas.
In regards to Wiggonton's question as to why is there no promotion of the founding ethnicities of our state, I would like to suggest that he look at the enrollment figures for Spring of 2007. In these figures he will find that of the 33,995 undergraduates, 26,830 of them were classified as White. I do believe that the founding ethnicities are proudly represented within the 26,830.
The statement that really surprised me was the one where Wigginton claims that we fought wars against Hispanics. Wars that they agitated and thus began. Based on what I remember from my school days, relations between Mexico and Texans started to sour a bit when Mexico forbid further emigration into Texas by settlers from the United States. While I am glad that Texas eventually secured its independence from Mexico, I am not sure you could classify them as the agitators.
Last but not least, the article is far from proving that racism exists at Texas A&M. In fact, I view the effort by the institution as simply promoting diversity. As long as this fine institution does NOT lower academic qualification criteria for ANY group, I applaud their recruitment efforts.
Sincerely,
Alejandro E. Martinez
Proud Aggie Parent
PS I for one would fight the renaming of College Station as mentioned in your response. However, the correct translation is - Estacion de Colegio.
Valerie Medrano
posted 6/06/07 @ 7:30 AM CST
Preston, so you want A&M to stop promotion Hispanic's to Texas A&M? No, you are wrong. It's because people like you that I did not even consider attending Texas A&M until Robert Gates became president. You are overreacting with the "Stacion de College Tejas A&M." So you probably agree that just because blacks were "whites" slaves not to long that Texas A&M shouldn't embrace them. Look at the gap between the traditional A&M student and minorities, it is huge just in case you haven't noticed. Do you not want any of us here? Grow up Preston and have more class. Diversity is a beautiful thing. I love the fact that when I walk across campus I hear and see varying races and languages. You hate what you cannot understand.
Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
-MLK, Jr.
I am a PROUD Mexican-American Class of 2008, A-WHO8P!
Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
-MLK, Jr.
I am a PROUD Mexican-American Class of 2008, A-WHO8P!
Dustin
posted 6/06/07 @ 8:16 AM CST
Originally posted byValerie Medrano
Preston, so you want A&M to stop promotion Hispanic's to Texas A&M? No, you are wrong. It's because people like you that I did not even consider attending Texas A&M until Robert Gates became president. You are overreacting with the "Stacion de College Tejas A&M." So you probably agree that just because blacks were "whites" slaves not to long that Texas A&M shouldn't embrace them. Look at the gap between the traditional A&M student and minorities, it is huge just in case you haven't noticed. Do you not want any of us here? Grow up Preston and have more class. Diversity is a beautiful thing. I love the fact that when I walk across campus I hear and see varying races and languages. You hate what you cannot understand.
Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
-MLK, Jr.
I am a PROUD Mexican-American Class of 2008, A-WHO8P!
Why do you have to refer to your self as a Mexican American? Why can't you simply be an American? If that is the case, I want to be referred to as a German-American then.
I do think that it's wrong to promote the school to race specific students. If those people want to come to A&M; that's fine, but do not recruit them based on their race alone. What usually happens is that when they arrive at A&M, they find out that it's primarily white and then go on the defensive. If they don't like the fact that A&M was an all white, male, military school, then don't come. Of course this is going to carry on through the ages because it's our history and heritage.
A&M has set up centers where I am from, the Rio Grande Valley to specifically target Hispanics. I would like to see what the statistics are on minorities that attend A&M their fish year and then leave. It just seems like time and money wasted. Instead, give that money to the general scholarship fund so that people who really want to go there can afford it.
There is nothing more that I hate than the National Hispanic Scholarship Fund. This is a racist organization. If there were to be a National Anglo Scholarship Fund, everyone would be up in arms. My point is this, let the people who want to come here come. Don't let a minority take their space just for the sake of politics. After all, isn't that why we have Prairie View and A&M Kingsville and A&M Corpus Christi?
Dustin
Class of 2005
Susan Gonzales
posted 4/19/08 @ 7:58 PM CST
Originally posted byValerie Medrano
Preston, so you want A&M to stop promotion Hispanic's to Texas A&M? No, you are wrong. It's because people like you that I did not even consider attending Texas A&M until Robert Gates became president. You are overreacting with the "Stacion de College Tejas A&M." So you probably agree that just because blacks were "whites" slaves not to long that Texas A&M shouldn't embrace them. Look at the gap between the traditional A&M student and minorities, it is huge just in case you haven't noticed. Do you not want any of us here? Grow up Preston and have more class. Diversity is a beautiful thing. I love the fact that when I walk across campus I hear and see varying races and languages. You hate what you cannot understand.
Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
-MLK, Jr.
I am a PROUD Mexican-American Class of 2008, A-WHO8P!
Valerie Medrano,
You yourself are creating a minority. I too am a Mexican-American and attending Texas A&M University. You cannot expect special treatment because of your race.I am embarassed by people like you. Understand we are not equal untill races stop demanding special treatment because they are "less capable" than dominant races.
Katherine "Speedy" Gonzales
posted 4/21/08 @ 12:54 AM CST
Originally posted byValerie Medrano
Preston, so you want A&M to stop promotion Hispanic's to Texas A&M? No, you are wrong. It's because people like you that I did not even consider attending Texas A&M until Robert Gates became president. You are overreacting with the "Stacion de College Tejas A&M." So you probably agree that just because blacks were "whites" slaves not to long that Texas A&M shouldn't embrace them. Look at the gap between the traditional A&M student and minorities, it is huge just in case you haven't noticed. Do you not want any of us here? Grow up Preston and have more class. Diversity is a beautiful thing. . You hate what you cannot understand.
Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
-MLK, Jr.
I am a PROUD Mexican-American Class of 2008, A-WHO8P!
Valerie,
"Preston, so you want A&M to stop promotion Hispanic's to Texas A&M? No, you are wrong."
First off, what's wrong is your grammar.
Secondly, you don't just get to tell people that they're wrong(sorry, you were probably really hoping you had that authority), especially when this person wasn't posting a fact, he was posting an opinion (which you obviously didn't fully understand anyway)--and opinions don't have a right or wrong (in case you were wondering).
And "So you probably agree that just because blacks were "whites" slaves not to long that Texas A&M shouldn't embrace them. " ( <-- There were more grammatical errors there, by the way.)
Please elaborate on how you came to that conclusion from what Preston put in his post.
"Do you not want any of us here?"
Again, where did you get that from?
"I love the fact that when I walk across campus I hear and see varying races and languages. You hate what you cannot understand."
I highly doubt he "hates" other races, AND didn't you previously say that the gap between traditional A&M students and minorities was huge? So why are you now making it sound like they are so prevalent on campus?
Also, your quote doesn't support your argument.
And what exactly were you trying to argue in the first place? You SHOULD be proud you are a Mexican-American because a "traditional A&M student" (read=not a minority) would never be admitted to Texas A&M if they wrote like you.
Stay classy, Val.
Elias Zuniga
posted 6/11/07 @ 3:09 PM CST
Hey Dustin,
Why don't you tell us you last name and your address in the Rio Grande Valley?
Surely you're not afraid of the big bad mexicans who take all your tamu scholarship money!!??
Why don't you tell us you last name and your address in the Rio Grande Valley?
Surely you're not afraid of the big bad mexicans who take all your tamu scholarship money!!??
Lisa
posted 6/12/07 @ 10:10 AM CST
Dustin, if someone wants to refer to themselves as a Mexican-American or German-American or Indian-American or African-American who cares? I am also a Mexican-American but before I am ANYTHING else, I am an American, a Texan, and an Aggie. So don't get upset by the labels.
"If they don't like the fact that A&M was an all white, male, military school, then don't come". -The operative word here is WAS. It WAS an all-white, male, military school. But not anymore! Change is GOOD. We still have the corps and our academics are outstanding. I'm sure you are also unhappy they let in women and those danged minorities. The fact is, an all-white male school does not represent the demographics of our great state.
"Don't let a minority take their space just for the sake of politics. After all, isn't that why we have Prarie View and A&M Kingsville and A&M Corpus Christi?" That's right, keep the minorities segregated at "their" school. You talk about a scholarship fund that you think is racist but I think you should look at yourself and if the shoe fits...
-Lisa
Class of 2007 WHOOP!
"If they don't like the fact that A&M was an all white, male, military school, then don't come". -The operative word here is WAS. It WAS an all-white, male, military school. But not anymore! Change is GOOD. We still have the corps and our academics are outstanding. I'm sure you are also unhappy they let in women and those danged minorities. The fact is, an all-white male school does not represent the demographics of our great state.
"Don't let a minority take their space just for the sake of politics. After all, isn't that why we have Prarie View and A&M Kingsville and A&M Corpus Christi?" That's right, keep the minorities segregated at "their" school. You talk about a scholarship fund that you think is racist but I think you should look at yourself and if the shoe fits...
-Lisa
Class of 2007 WHOOP!
Dustin
posted 6/13/07 @ 6:01 PM CST
Originally posted byLisa
Dustin, if someone wants to refer to themselves as a Mexican-American or German-American or Indian-American or African-American who cares? I am also a Mexican-American but before I am ANYTHING else, I am an American, a Texan, and an Aggie. So don't get upset by the labels.
"If they don't like the fact that A&M was an all white, male, military school, then don't come". -The operative word here is WAS. It WAS an all-white, male, military school. But not anymore! Change is GOOD. We still have the corps and our academics are outstanding. I'm sure you are also unhappy they let in women and those danged minorities. The fact is, an all-white male school does not represent the demographics of our great state.
"Don't let a minority take their space just for the sake of politics. After all, isn't that why we have Prarie View and A&M Kingsville and A&M Corpus Christi?" That's right, keep the minorities segregated at "their" school. You talk about a scholarship fund that you think is racist but I think you should look at yourself and if the shoe fits...
-Lisa
Class of 2007 WHOOP!
So, I suppose that you would not get upset if I called you a Mexican? I know that I get upset when I have Spanish speaking people call me a gringo or guero? That is why I get upset about your label of Mexican-American.
Funny how you left out the line where I mentioned that being an all white, male military school was part of our history, heritage and culture. Its part of our tradition. And that will carry on through the ages.
Now, if you are so naive that you can honestly tell me that we do not have these minority schools in the A&M system just to have our overall numbers look more diverse, then you ma'am are wrong. It's politics.
Why does the main campus of A&M have to be diverse? Why cant it be open to who wants to come. If they want to come, they will have proved themselves through academics and extracurricular activities to distance themselves from the pack. Those are the students that A&M wants.
Dustin
Class of 2005
John Gray
posted 9/25/07 @ 8:57 PM CST
Hello Dusty,
Just think if TAMU wasn't diverse (as you would wish it to be), you wouldn't have a football team or basketball team competing in the Big12. You'd be at a Division III school at best. How naive you and your white compadres are. You are not what a true Aggie represents. Thank God for people with brains, like our former president Robert Gates.
Just think if TAMU wasn't diverse (as you would wish it to be), you wouldn't have a football team or basketball team competing in the Big12. You'd be at a Division III school at best. How naive you and your white compadres are. You are not what a true Aggie represents. Thank God for people with brains, like our former president Robert Gates.
Originally posted byLisa
Dustin, if someone wants to refer to themselves as a Mexican-American or German-American or Indian-American or African-American who cares? I am also a Mexican-American but before I am ANYTHING else, I am an American, a Texan, and an Aggie. So don't get upset by the labels.
"If they don't like the fact that A&M was an all white, male, military school, then don't come". -The operative word here is WAS. It WAS an all-white, male, military school. But not anymore! Change is GOOD. We still have the corps and our academics are outstanding. I'm sure you are also unhappy they let in women and those danged minorities. The fact is, an all-white male school does not represent the demographics of our great state.
"Don't let a minority take their space just for the sake of politics. After all, isn't that why we have Prarie View and A&M Kingsville and A&M Corpus Christi?" That's right, keep the minorities segregated at "their" school. You talk about a scholarship fund that you think is racist but I think you should look at yourself and if the shoe fits...
-Lisa
Class of 2007 WHOOP!
Lisa
posted 6/14/07 @ 12:38 AM CST
Dustin, its fine if you call me a Mexican, because I AM one. Just as if I were to call you white or caucasian. If I'm not mistaken "gringo" and "guero" are slang so comparing what you're saying (calling me Mexican to calling you "gringo") isn't the same thing at all. Personally I don't use those slang terms anyway.
I don't argue that being all white etc., WASN'T part of our history, heritage and culture. I'm just saying the demographics are changing now. But if you look around campus I think you can see its safe to say that A&M is still OVERWHELMINGLY white. Plus the Corps is still a vital presence and one that will never (and should never) go away.
These "minority schools" are not just in the system to make A&M look good. Prairie View was founded in the same year as A&M-1876. It is a predominantly black school now but do you think it founded to be a minority school then? I doubt A&M really thought about that at the time. :) TAMU CC is about 50% white, would you call that a minority school? TAMU Kingsville is a little over half Hispanic.
A&M should be diverse simply because our state/nation is diverse, and some people seriously have NEVER interacted with people outside of their own culture, which only fuels further disputes and misconceptions. The more we can interact, the better we'll be in the long run.
You say, "Why cant it be open to who wants to come. If they want to come, they will have proved themselves through academics and extracurricular activities to distance themselves from the pack. Those are the students A&M wants." Guess what, we're here. I proved myself. I went to a very competitive high school and was barely out of the top 10% but I had a lot of extracurriculars and still excellent grades, so here I am. I'm here because I want to be here, because I loved A&M when my sister attended here before me, and I love it now as I am getting ready to graduate. College is supposed to open your eyes, challenge your beliefs, and expose you to things you've never experienced before. One cannot go to an all white, male college and pretend that's how the world is. The world is not a vacuum...there are more than white males out there.
-Lisa
Fightin' Texas Aggie c/o 2007 WHOOP!
I don't argue that being all white etc., WASN'T part of our history, heritage and culture. I'm just saying the demographics are changing now. But if you look around campus I think you can see its safe to say that A&M is still OVERWHELMINGLY white. Plus the Corps is still a vital presence and one that will never (and should never) go away.
These "minority schools" are not just in the system to make A&M look good. Prairie View was founded in the same year as A&M-1876. It is a predominantly black school now but do you think it founded to be a minority school then? I doubt A&M really thought about that at the time. :) TAMU CC is about 50% white, would you call that a minority school? TAMU Kingsville is a little over half Hispanic.
A&M should be diverse simply because our state/nation is diverse, and some people seriously have NEVER interacted with people outside of their own culture, which only fuels further disputes and misconceptions. The more we can interact, the better we'll be in the long run.
You say, "Why cant it be open to who wants to come. If they want to come, they will have proved themselves through academics and extracurricular activities to distance themselves from the pack. Those are the students A&M wants." Guess what, we're here. I proved myself. I went to a very competitive high school and was barely out of the top 10% but I had a lot of extracurriculars and still excellent grades, so here I am. I'm here because I want to be here, because I loved A&M when my sister attended here before me, and I love it now as I am getting ready to graduate. College is supposed to open your eyes, challenge your beliefs, and expose you to things you've never experienced before. One cannot go to an all white, male college and pretend that's how the world is. The world is not a vacuum...there are more than white males out there.
-Lisa
Fightin' Texas Aggie c/o 2007 WHOOP!
COL (Ret) Raul G. Villaronga '59
posted 8/14/07 @ 11:58 PM CST
Perhaps we have forgotten history, starting with the discovery of America by Cristobal Colón (Christopher Columbus to you), and the colonization of the southwest by the Spaniards. Also remember that Texas as originally part of Mexico before it became part of the United States. Finally, Spanish was spoken in Texas long before any other language. Part of the uniqueness of our state is it's diversity and acceptance of other ethnicities as part of our culture.
By the way, I was born in Puerto Rico, started at Texas A&M College in 1954 and graduated in 1959, commissioned in the US Army as a 2LT, retired as a Colonel, served as Mayor in Killeen, Texas and then Juvenile Judge before I finally retired (fully) in 2003. I plan to attenmd the Hispanic Summitt, Dustin, and would be glad to discuss even more of our history with you, if you wish.
Raul G. Villaronga
COL, US Army (Retired)
By the way, I was born in Puerto Rico, started at Texas A&M College in 1954 and graduated in 1959, commissioned in the US Army as a 2LT, retired as a Colonel, served as Mayor in Killeen, Texas and then Juvenile Judge before I finally retired (fully) in 2003. I plan to attenmd the Hispanic Summitt, Dustin, and would be glad to discuss even more of our history with you, if you wish.
Raul G. Villaronga
COL, US Army (Retired)
Julia
posted 8/17/07 @ 5:54 PM CST
I would just like to say that I have no hispanic heritage in me and have checked the anglo box my whole life, and I believe any form of recruitment is a good thing. And I agree with Alejandro who said "as long as they do not LOWER academic qualifications for ANY group, then i applaud their efforts forts".
I understand where the frustration comes from when you see scholarships specifically for one ethnic group and you don't see any for "white". But did you know that there are scholarships for those of german, italian, european, ect descent? There are no scholarships for "whites" because that is too broad of a label. If you actually research and educate yourself before making an argument it will make your argument stronger.
Also, did you know that there are scholarships for people out-of-state? Shouldn't we just take all the money spent on recruiting/scholarships for out of state and put it towards people in Texas who know about A&M and want to go here. I believe that argument would be along the same lines as "only letting in people that want to come here come here". My point is if we did not let your friends from out of state know how great of a school this is...then how would they have known to come here. The purpose of recruiting is to inform people who ARE NOT INFORMED about what a great place this is. And (just as in any argument, you can't argue that it is 100% accurate) but most of the "white all-americans" who grow up wanting to come here do so because they grew up being exposed to the great people and place of Aggieland.
And one more thing. According to your argument, we should also get rid of all staff and professors who are from out of state or out of the country, because I am sure that money was spent on recruiting these international/out-of-state professors. And it would be better to just have professors who apply to teach here be the only ones we allow to do so, instead of educating professors who are at the top of their fields about how A&M is growing such as they could if they taught here.
All I know is that i want the best professors even if we had to "recruit" them to A&M, as well as, the best students from around the world. Interacting with other cultures allows you to better understand the limitations of your own. It helps you to learn how to grow WHILE ALSO PRESERVING and strengthening YOUR IMPORTANT TRADITIONS. A&M has grown to allow in non-corp students, to women, to minorities...and it is still stereotyped as being steeped in tradition despite these changes. As long as we take time to teach the next Aggies what A&M is mainly about, then they will carry on our main traditions and ideals. The point is we must take the time to teach!
Ignorace is Fear of the unknown which is shown as anger and rejection of trying to learn about that unkown.
I understand where the frustration comes from when you see scholarships specifically for one ethnic group and you don't see any for "white". But did you know that there are scholarships for those of german, italian, european, ect descent? There are no scholarships for "whites" because that is too broad of a label. If you actually research and educate yourself before making an argument it will make your argument stronger.
Also, did you know that there are scholarships for people out-of-state? Shouldn't we just take all the money spent on recruiting/scholarships for out of state and put it towards people in Texas who know about A&M and want to go here. I believe that argument would be along the same lines as "only letting in people that want to come here come here". My point is if we did not let your friends from out of state know how great of a school this is...then how would they have known to come here. The purpose of recruiting is to inform people who ARE NOT INFORMED about what a great place this is. And (just as in any argument, you can't argue that it is 100% accurate) but most of the "white all-americans" who grow up wanting to come here do so because they grew up being exposed to the great people and place of Aggieland.
And one more thing. According to your argument, we should also get rid of all staff and professors who are from out of state or out of the country, because I am sure that money was spent on recruiting these international/out-of-state professors. And it would be better to just have professors who apply to teach here be the only ones we allow to do so, instead of educating professors who are at the top of their fields about how A&M is growing such as they could if they taught here.
All I know is that i want the best professors even if we had to "recruit" them to A&M, as well as, the best students from around the world. Interacting with other cultures allows you to better understand the limitations of your own. It helps you to learn how to grow WHILE ALSO PRESERVING and strengthening YOUR IMPORTANT TRADITIONS. A&M has grown to allow in non-corp students, to women, to minorities...and it is still stereotyped as being steeped in tradition despite these changes. As long as we take time to teach the next Aggies what A&M is mainly about, then they will carry on our main traditions and ideals. The point is we must take the time to teach!
Ignorace is Fear of the unknown which is shown as anger and rejection of trying to learn about that unkown.
- Displaying 1 - 13 of 13
Post Your Comment
Remembering 2:42
News
Volleyball back in win column
Sports
'Riverdance' comes to OPAS on farewell tour
Features
A sweet deal
Features
Turning up my nose up to 'taste'
Opinion
Aggies are we
Opinion
We'd like to feature some extraordinary Aggies who have their own special story to tell. Please submit your nominations to battcopy@thebatt.com
Spring Break






Preston Wiginton TAMU 2010
posted 6/06/07 @ 6:06 AM CST
Why are there no promotion of the founding ethnicities of our state and the University as far as that goes?
In fact as far as Hispanics go we fought wars against them that they agitated and thus began.
Texas A&M has never had a Hispanic President and until the amnesty of 1986, only the second amnesty since 1848, hispanics at TAMU were multigenerational Texans, not hyphonated hispanics...i.e. they only thought of themsleves as Americas, not Mexican-Americans.
This article of promoting one group and not promoting others in a equal representation and proportionate spending is just proof of racism on campus. Racism in the sense of race promoting for a political cause. One that is insulting to the founders of Texas and the founders of Texas A&M University College Station or will that soon be Stacion de College Tejas A&M.