Fuming Mad
Abstract:
On June 11, the U.S. Senate passed legislation enabling the Food and Drug Administration to impose stricter controls on the manufacturing and marketing of cigarettes.
The government has overreached its authority again by granting itself the power to alter even the taste and names of cigarettes in a noble effort to force citizens to make the right choice regarding health....
- Displaying 1 - 4 of 4
robert
posted 7/02/09 @ 1:57 PM CST
Enjoyed Ian's take on Government power over smoking. thanks Robert.
Edward
posted 7/04/09 @ 2:28 PM CST
This is about forcing tobacco companies to be honest about their products. Consumers can't make informed decisions about products if the companies are permitted to lie at every turn about the health effects of their products. Naming cigarettes "lites" or making claims that these particular cigarettes are less unhealthy that are provably false is unfair and ought to be illegal. Only someone who's hate for any and all government has blinded them could be against regulating the claims that purveyors of known harmful products can make.
Ol Ag
posted 7/06/09 @ 9:44 AM CST
I do not believe that the reason is because the government is trying to control everything...it's about HEALTH CARE! The cost of health care is alarmingly high. The government is in a predicament to try to come up with ways to make health care affordable to EVERY American. Who foots a majority of the bill? The tax payer. A GREAT deal of health problems can be attributed to smoking. Therefore, taxing those that contribute to the problem the most makes sense. Smokers CHOOSE to smoke and get sick and have a multitude of health problems. There are some unfortunate people out there who contract diseases that have a led a healthy life. So, why is it that they have to go bankrupt because of it? By increasing the tax, the government is trying to convince people to STOP smoking, therefore, decreasing the health problems and improving the cost of health care.
The tax is not without good reason.
The tax is not without good reason.
- Displaying 1 - 4 of 4
Post Your Comment
Remembering 2:42
News
Volleyball back in win column
Sports
'Riverdance' comes to OPAS on farewell tour
Features
A sweet deal
Features
Turning up my nose up to 'taste'
Opinion
Aggies are we
Opinion
We'd like to feature some extraordinary Aggies who have their own special story to tell. Please submit your nominations to battcopy@thebatt.com
Spring Break






Susan
posted 7/02/09 @ 9:29 AM CST
But... A number of health problems are linked directly to smoking. According to the National Cancer Institute, smoking can lead to cancers of the lung, trachea, bronchus, larynx, pharynx, oral cavity, nasal cavity, and esophagus. It has even been linked to cancers in the digestive system, as well as leukemia. They also believe cigarettes are responsible for 25% of dealth from house fires.
So... I'll make a deal with you. You just keep on smokin', but when you get cancer or your house burns down, don't expect any insurance money or taxpayer paid services for your self-inflicted injuries. Insurance won't pay for self-inflicted wounds, so why should it pay for self-inflicted cancer?